Another Really Crazy Week in Politics

I thought last week was crazy. Until the week we just got through happened. Where to begin.

1

Well, in my blog last week, I had predicted that debate moderator Anderson Cooper was setting Trump up when he asked the Republican nominee over and over “have you DONE any of those things” (referring to uninvited advances with women), and Trump responded “no, I have not.” I had said that “I wouldn’t be surprised if they (the Democrats/the mainstream press – they’re after all one and the same) haven’t already lined up a woman, or women, who would claim that Trump did indeed make uninvited advances. And they’ll drip, drip, drip this stuff between now and the election…” Well I sure got that one right (except that rather than a drip, drip, drip, it’s been a torrent of alleged victims.)

2

Will these allegations make a difference in the race? They already have. Whether they’re true or not. And if they are true, the perpetrator, in this case Donald Trump, deserves condemnation.

Are they telling the truth? We don’t know. The timing is obviously suspect, less than a month before the election, when they allegedly happened decades ago.

3

What’s Hillary think about all this? She’s of course strongly criticizing Trump. And as for the women, Hillary loudly proclaimed about a year ago that “every survivor of sexual assault deserves to be heard, BELIEVED (my emphasis), and supported.” Boy has she changed her tune. When her husband was accused of being a serial predator, not only did she NOT believe the victims, but she led the smear campaign to discredit Bill Clinton’s accusers. Commonly referred to as the “sluts and nuts” campaign, Hillary viciously attacked each of the women who had been a victim of her husband’s abhorrent behavior. This behavior even included rape in the case of Juanita Broaddrick.

4

The mainstream press has given wall to wall coverage of Donald Trump’s accusers over the last week. Of course they virtually ignored the Clinton accusers who came forward, including Juanita Broaddrick, Paula Jones, and Kathleen Willig against Bill, and Kathy Shelton who’d been raped at the age of 12, and had to live with Hillary’s laughing at the thrill she got out of getting a guilty client who raped a child, off scot-free.

5

Here are some of the other things the mainstream press virtually ignored over the past week in order to get their chosen candidate, Hillary Clinton, across the finish line. Hillary’s top people mock Catholics and Evangelicals. They think Hispanics are “needy”. Her campaign chairman John Podesta called Bernie Sanders a “doofus.” Hillary herself “hates everyday Americans.” And in fact, not only did she famously call Donald Trump’s supporters a “basket of deplorables”, but she calls her own people a “bucket of losers.” Hillary has to be told in speeches when to smile. (I’m not making this stuff up!) She thinks it’s just fine to have a “public” and a “private” position on issues. (In other words, it’s okay to mislead {lie to} the public.) Hillary admits she’s for “open borders.” She thinks more food stamps will fix the economy! Her people were colluding behind the scenes with the Justice Department to avoid prosecution for her email scandal. Clinton allies were “bird dogging” Trump rallies, sometimes hiring mentally ill people or union goons, to initiate violence and start trouble, for which the mainstream press would blame Trump (it worked). We learned that CNN commentator Donna Brazile was acting as a mole at CNN for the Clinton campaign. And if you needed any more proof that the press is in the tank for Hillary, 96% of the money journalists contributed in the presidential campaign this time went to Hillary, and only 4% went to Trump. And on and on. There’s more, but that’s enough for this week.

6

So is it really rigged, as Donald Trump has been saying lately? I’d like to think that it’s not. But ya gotta wonder…

7

See you next week.

Like this post? Share with your friends:

You Might Also Be Interested In

Join the Campaign

Thank you for your support